Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ; 151(2):AB27, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2245759

ABSTRACT

Rationale: To seek optimal dosing regimens for Oral immunotherapy (OIT). Methods: A retrospective chart review of 93 patients undergoing "bite proof” nut OIT dosing was undertaken. Patients were escalated to doses of 250-500mg of nut protein for a 6-12 month period and then completed a 2gm nut challenge. Results: Among 93 patients, a total of 209 2g Nut Oral Food Challenges (OFCs) were conducted. 202 of the 209 administered 2g OFCs were passed (96.65%). Among the 6 patients who did not tolerate the initial 2gm OFC, there were no obvious differentiating characteristics identified including single vs multiple food OIT administration, age, concomitant omalizumab, or change in IgE levels from baseline. 12 of the 93 patients who successfully passed the 2gm challenge elected to reduce their dose to the bite proof dosing 3x weekly. 7 of these 12 patients completed a subsequent 2gm OFC 1 year after the initial OFC. All 7 patients successfully tolerated the second 2gm OFC. Conclusions: Patients undergoing a 6-12 month course of 250-500mg daily nut protein dosing exhibited robust success in passing a 2gm OFC. Defining characteristics of patients who failed initial 2gm OFCs could not be determined due to the small number of OFC failures. A subset of patients passing the 2gm OFC demonstrated continued success in tolerating a 2gm nut challenge following a decrease in dosing frequency. Unfortunately the COVID pandemic prohibited further OFCs study of such patients. Future studies of such patients will help elucidate ideal long term OIT dosing strategies.

2.
12th Annual IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC 2022 ; : 137-142, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2136174

ABSTRACT

This work addresses the vital need of keeping people informed with relevant, correct and essential information during the pandemic. Advanced NLP and machine learning mechanisms have been leveraged to generate responses to user queries through contextual conversation. In order to help people be discerning about what information they receive, a conversational system is proposed that identifies the correct intent of the query and a reinforcement Learning based generation model is used to proceed with conversation. We propose an end-to-end real-time text generation model that can respond to users queries on covid19. We created a new dataset with 1200+ covid-related questions from various sources and pre-processed them for a brief and direct answer. The dataset has also been manually observed to identify depressed questions and the responses are converted to be more empathetic. The dataset has been used to fine-tune DailoGPT, a GPT2-based transformer model to generate the responses related to COVID. COVID-related queries are bucketed into 15 categories to identify the exact intent of people. Our model generated both contextual and empathetic responses and achieved a human evaluation score of 3.48 (on a scale of 5) in terms of contextual relevance and a score of 2.12 (on a scale of 3). © 2022 IEEE.

4.
Neurology ; 98(18 SUPPL), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1925419

ABSTRACT

Objective: Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 RNA and inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the CSF of patients with acute COVID-19 and neurologic symptoms, and to compare these to controls and patients with known neurotropic pathogens. Background: Neurologic symptoms have been described in 30-60% of hospitalized patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, little is known about CSF profiles in these patients. Design/Methods: CSF from twenty-seven consecutive patients with COVID-19 and neurological symptoms was assayed for SARS-CoV-2 RNA using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) and unbiased metagenomic sequencing. Assays for blood brain barrier (BBB) breakdown (CSF:serum albumin ratio (Q-Alb)), and proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, IL-16, monocyte chemoattractant protein -1 (MCP-1) and monocyte inhibitory protein - 1β (MIP-1β)) were performed in 23 patients and compared to CSF from patients with HIV-1 (16 virally suppressed, 5 unsuppressed), West Nile virus (WNV) (n=4) and 16 healthy controls (HC). Results: Median CSF cell count for COVID-19 patients was 1 white blood cell/μL;two patients were infected with a second pathogen (Neisseria, Cryptococcus neoformans). No CSF samples had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA by either detection method. In patients with COVID-19 only, CSF IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, and MIP-1β levels were higher than HC and suppressed HIV (corrected-p < 0.05). MCP-1 and MIP-1β levels were higher, while IL-6, IL-8, IL-15 were similar in COVID-19 compared to WNV patients. Q-Alb correlated with all proinflammatory markers, with IL-6, IL-8, and MIP-1β (r≥0.6, p<0.01) demonstrating the strongest associations. Conclusions: Lack of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in CSF is consistent with pre-existing literature. Evidence of intrathecal proinflammatory markers in a subset of COVID-19 patients with BBB breakdown despite minimal CSF pleocytosis is atypical for neurotropic pathogens.

5.
Jcom-Journal of Science Communication ; 21(3):22, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1856559

ABSTRACT

This paper synthesizes the efforts of an interdisciplinary, University-convened communication task force in the U.S. that used science communication theory to develop an effective strategy during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We outline recommendations for researchers and practitioners who are, or are interested in, implementing theory-based communication practices while describing how we dealt with the unforeseen realities we faced. Overall, we recommend that effective public health and science communication should be based on theory and formative evaluation while relying on established infrastructure, real-time data, a deep understanding of intended target audiences, and intentional coordination with community partners.

6.
Blood ; 138:3887, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582301

ABSTRACT

Introduction: World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) promotes global collaboration for the benefit of stem cell donors and transplant patients. WMDA activities include recording the number of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donations globally. Because the COVID-19 pandemic also has an impact on the treatment of patients with other diseases, we hypothesise that it also impacted the practice of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We used the 2020 WMDA data to examine the trends in unrelated HSC donations during the COVID-19 pandemic globally, per continent and per country/region. Methods: Donor registries (DRs) and cord blood banks (CBBs) from 61 countries participated in the 2020 survey, compared to 59 countries in the 2019. Slight differences in participation between the data sets of 2019 and 2020 do not explain the trends we observe in HSC donations. Country/region-specific COVID-19 data on cases and deaths were obtained from the data repository operated by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering(https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19, accessed July 12, 2021);and population data were retrieved from the Worldometer website(https://www.worldometers.info/, accessed July 12, 2021). Results: HSC donations from unrelated donors (peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and bone marrow (BM)) decreased from 20,330 in 2019 to 19,623 in 2020 (-3.5%), compared to an average annual growth rate of 3.9% from 2015 to 2019 (figure 1). The 3.5% decrease is composed of a 29.0% decrease for BM and a 2.6% increase for PBSC, resulting in a drop in the BM share of unrelated HSC donations from 19.3% in 2019 to 14.2% in 2020. The number of cord blood unit (CBU) shipments globally decreased with 3.5% from 2,851 to 2,750. The percentage of national use of HSC products (PBSC and BM) increased from 51.2% to 53.5%. When considering the continent on which the patient is transplanted (table 1), the change rate of use of HSC donated products in 2020 vs. 2019 ranged from -28.0% in South America to +18.2% in Africa. In absolute numbers, the largest decrease of HSC donations occurred for patients in Asia (n=-485) followed by Europe (n=-205), and the largest increase occurred in North America (n=+88) followed by Oceania (n=+25). The share of HSC donations requiring intercontinental transport decreased from 24.6% in 2019 to 21.9% in 2020. In terms of the country/region of transplant (table 2), the largest percentage decrease occurred in Colombia (-90,5%) followed by Russia (-55,5%). In absolute numbers, the largest decrease occurred in Turkey (-147), with Japan following (-128, although Japan saw an increase of CBU use of +106). The highest growth rate was observed in Iran (+28,7%), followed by South Africa (+28,2%). In absolute figures, the greatest increase occurred in Italy (+67). The two countries receiving the largest HSC donation numbers showed no major changes versus the previous year: USA: +0.6% (although a decrease for CBU of -21,0% was observed) and Germany: -2.4%. We did not find any significant correlation between the numbers of COVID-19 cases or COVID-19-related deaths per 1 million inhabitants with the HSC donation numbers (Spearman's r=0.05 for cases and =0.08 for deaths). Discussion: The decline in the number of unrelated HSC donations in 2020 suggests an impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HSC donation and unrelated HSCT. The significant decrease in BM collections and intercontinental/cross-border shipments can be explained by logistically complex processes, as well the increased risk to the donor of being exposed to an operative procedure. CBU as a stem cell source potentially circumvents these logistical complications. However, on a global scale our data does not show increased use of CBU suggesting that decisions to use CBU as a stem cell source did not change in the pandemic. We were unable to demonstrate a correlation between country/region-specific severity of the pandemic and HSC donation numbers. We suspect this is due to the data quality of reported number of COVID-1 cases and COVID-19-related deaths. Also, we did not gather monthly data and therefore could not specify pandemic waves. In conclusion, we would like to point out the fact that global exchanges of HSC products continued and only decreased slightly is an extraordinary achievement of DRs, CBBs and their donors and is a testament to the importance of international collaborations in the WMDA. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Devine: Orca Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding;Johnsonand Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;Magenta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Research Funding;Tmunity: Current Employment, Research Funding;Vor Bio: Research Funding;Kiadis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Be the Match: Current Employment. Shaw: Orca bio: Consultancy;mallinkrodt: Other: payments. Forman: Mustang Bio: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Lixte Biotechnology: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company;Allogene: Consultancy.

7.
Blood ; 138:2846, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582250

ABSTRACT

[Formula presented] Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns regarding travel logistics and donor safety necessitated a substantial increase in the use of cryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) grafts from both related (RD) and unrelated donors (URD) to ensure patients have a graft available prior to the start of conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, pre-pandemic data beyond single center or small multi-center reports are lacking to reassure clinicians that cryopreservation of allogeneic grafts does not adversely impact post-HCT outcomes including hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival (OS). The Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) has recently published three retrospective analyses of outcomes in recipients of cryopreserved compared to fresh grafts administered prior to the pandemic. Results have been conflicting and reasons for receipt of cryopreserved grafts were not routinely collected, rendering interpretation of the impact of cryopreservation on clinical outcomes problematic. Since the pandemic provided a unifying rationale (including mandatory cryopreservation required by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) and other major registries) for the majority of patients to receive cryopreserved allografts, we sought to evaluate early post-HCT clinical outcomes in patients reported to the CIBMTR database who received a first allogeneic HCT using cryopreserved grafts from March through August 2020. Methods: Key study endpoints were hematopoietic engraftment and overall survival (OS). We compared these outcomes to those in patients allografted using fresh products transplanted between March through August 2019. Additional patient selection criteria included: 1) recipients in US only, 2) peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) or bone marrow (BM) grafts, 3) consented to research, and 4) availability of both CIBMTR product infusion and post-HCT day 100 (D100) follow-up form. The Pearson chi-square test was used for comparing discrete variables;the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparing continuous variables. Multivariate analysis (MVA) using a Cox proportional hazards model was performed for OS after adjusting for confounders and testing the proportional hazards assumption. Neutrophil engraftment by D28 and platelet engraftment by D100 were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: This study included 959 and 2,499 recipients of cryopreserved and fresh products, respectively. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Recipients of cryopreserved grafts were older, more likely to receive URD grafts, PBSC as the graft source and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. They received lower infused PBSC and BM cell doses. Due to differences in duration of follow-up between the cohorts, follow up for the OS analysis was censored at Days 100 and 180. MVA results are presented in Table 2. No impact of cryopreservation on OS at either D100 (HR 0.93, p=0.72) or D180 (HR 1.10, p=0.34) post HCT was detected (see also Figure 1). When we performed the MVA for OS limiting the analysis to URD recipients only, the results were unchanged. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were both delayed by 1 day in recipients of cryopreserved grafts (16 vs. 15 days and 21 vs. 20 days, respectively) but there was no difference in the risk of primary graft failure by D28 (OR 1.38, p=0.96). Some delay in D100 platelet engraftment was observed in recipients of cryopreserved grafts (OR 0.67, p<0.005). There were no interactions identified between donor or graft type for OS or engraftment. Other important clinical outcomes such as secondary graft failure, acute GVHD, and early relapse are being analyzed and will be included at the time of presentation. Conclusion: The shift in clinical practice to cryopreserved products necessitated during the pandemic did not adversely impact early post HCT OS or risk of primary graft failure. We caution that follow up is short and it ill be critical to follow this cohort and subsequent recipients of cryopreserved grafts for much longer periods to determine the ultimate impact of cryopreservation on outcomes. Nevertheless, this large multi-center study will be useful to inform clinical decision making both during and following the pandemic. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Devine: Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding;Magenta Therapeutics: Current Employment, Research Funding;Tmunity: Current Employment, Research Funding;Vor Bio: Research Funding;Kiadis: Consultancy, Research Funding;Johnsonand Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding;Orca Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding;Be the Match: Current Employment. Stefanski: Novartis: Honoraria. Shaw: mallinkrodt: Other: payments;Orca bio: Consultancy.

8.
American Journal of Transplantation ; 21:43-43, 2021.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-1063963
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL